Grammar in Real Use

What a Grammar Mistake Can Tell Us About Understanding

Not every mistake means the same thing. Some show a learner has not met a rule yet, some show they are applying a rule too widely, and some are simple slips. Reading the difference changes how we respond.

By Scholarise Academy3 min readPublished For parents and educators

A learner's notebook where a sentence with a new word is crossed out and rewritten more naturally in green ink

The questionWhat does a grammar mistake reveal about understanding?

“Yesterday I goed to the market.”

The quick reaction is to correct it: went, not goed. That is reasonable. But before correcting, it is worth asking what the mistake shows, because this one shows quite a lot.

A mistake can be a sign of learning

To say goed, a learner has to have noticed that English often adds -ed to talk about the past. They have taken that pattern and applied it to a new verb. That is real grammatical thinking. The learner has simply not yet stored went as the exception.

Compare that with a learner who says “Yesterday I go to the market.” This may suggest the past tense pattern is not yet in use at all when speaking, even if the learner can do it on a worksheet.

The two sentences are both “wrong”, but they point to different next steps.

“Yesterday I goed…”

The learner is using the past tense rule, and applying it too widely.

Next step: highlight common irregular verbs and give practice with them.

“Yesterday I go…”

The past form is not yet appearing in speech.

Next step: more practice telling short past events with support, such as a sentence frame.

Three kinds of mistakes worth telling apart

  • A rule not yet learned. The learner has not met the structure, or met it too briefly. Explanation and examples help.
  • A rule applied too widely. Like goed or mouses. The learner understands the pattern but not its exceptions. Focused practice on the exceptions helps.
  • A slip. The learner knows the form and usually uses it, but missed it this time, often when concentrating on the idea. A quick prompt such as “Yesterday I…?” is often enough for them to correct it themselves.

Correcting without discouraging

How a mistake is corrected matters as much as whether it is corrected. A learner who is stopped after every sentence may decide that speaking is risky and start giving shorter answers.

  • Respond to the message first. “You went to the market? What did you buy?”
  • Model the correct form in your reply. The learner hears went in a natural sentence.
  • Choose what to correct. Focus on one pattern at a time rather than every error.
  • Invite self-correction for slips. A raised eyebrow or “Yesterday I…?” lets the learner fix it themselves.

Takeaway

What educators can observe

  • Is the mistake a rule not yet learned, a rule applied too widely, or a slip?
  • Does the learner make the same mistake in writing and in speaking, or only in one?
  • Can the learner correct it when prompted? If so, it is likely a slip rather than a gap.

Sources

Research referred to in this article. Links open the original publication or its official record.

  1. Black & Wiliam (1998), Inside the Black Box

Learning trail: Responding to mistakes without silencing a learner

Next on this pathHow Parents Can Support English Practice Without Creating Pressure

Then bring that thinking into relaxed conversation at home.

Step 2 of 3

Back to the Journal

Chat on WhatsApp